Jump to content

sue

Members
  • Content count

    3,706
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

sue last won the day on August 26 2016

sue had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3,966 Excellent

About sue

  • Rank
    Master Demon

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

7,130 profile views
  1. sue

    Round 14 Non MFC Games

    Ridiculous. And not even the weak excuse that the ball was in play in one case and not the other case. But not unusual - umps hardly ever pay a free for a push in the back after the ball goes over the line, even though the player is pushed towards the fence. You have to hit the fence hard to get a free. AFL umpiring is a disgrace.
  2. sue

    Round 14 Non MFC Games

    I'm barracking for Essendrug. I'm feeling unclean. Will need therapy.
  3. sue

    Goodwin Presser 19/6

    Easy to say, but do you not think that the C'wood players were not "burning up" to put the boot into us again and cement themselves into the 8. We can't rely on these sort of revenge motivations to win games over other motivations. While there are clear cases when the performance suggests motivation was lacking, I don't think that match was such a case.
  4. sue

    Goodwin Presser 19/6

    Sounds more like they are all responsible, including Gawn.
  5. sue

    Round 13 Non - MFC Games

    While on the face of it, it does seem over-the-top for players to be rubbed out for 'minor inconsequential umpire touching', I don't think it's simple where to draw the line. At what point DC do you think it should become more than a fine? Eg, apparently the AFL now (suddenly) considers showing the umpire how someone was pushed is a fine (and will change the rules at year's end, while not enforcing it now). But presumably showing the umpire how someone had their head pulled off and spun to the ground is still a suspension. So the AFL/Tribunal will as usual have to make decisions on each case. If only they could do it without many of us being suspicious as to the motivations for their inconsistencies, particularly wiht 'stars'. If they keep on their current course I'll need therapy to overcome my growing cynicism.
  6. sue

    Round 13 Non - MFC Games

    No one is surprised.
  7. sue

    Round 13 Non - MFC Games

    I can't wait for a player to demonstrate to an umpire how he had been pulled around the neck and deserved a free. Will they get a fine?
  8. sue

    Round 13 Non - MFC Games

    ha ha ha ha
  9. sue

    New CEO - Gary Pert

    Yes - what rock have you been sleeping under? And I'm not just referring to their playing fast and loose with personal data in pursuit of the $.
  10. sue

    New CEO - Gary Pert

    Could be because the average MFC supporter is smart enough to avoid the evil that is Facebook. At least I'd hope so.
  11. sue

    Round 13 Non - MFC Games

    Not sure which is worse, the Dogs or the Umpires.
  12. Interesting his remarks about TMac on the wing. Said he understood it, but thought it's best to play players in their best position. Said oppo coaches would be rubbing their hands with glee when he starts on the wing. I don't understand it. What is the aim of starting TMac on the wing?
  13. sue

    Post Match Discussion - Round 12

    After a disappoint loss I avoid this thread for a few days because of the inevitable overreaction and wrist slitting that usually occurs. So I haven't found out what happened to Oscar and when. Appreciate it if someone will let me know. (All I know is that at some stage latish in the game the TV people said he was off with concussion but they never followed it up or showed the incident - too busy having orgasms over C'wood I guess.)
  14. sue

    Round 12 Non-MFC

    Everyone know that in order to stab someone in the back you first have to get behind them.
  15. And you might have to replace Pert with Melbourne in the URL that comes up when you click on the Perth match https://7plus.com.au/live-tv . They seem to have screwed something up.
×